Hmd

96 Table of Contents

[threecol_one]

DISCOURSE

KNOWLEDGE OF THE SELF
by Alireza Nurbakhsh

 

ARTICLES AND ESSAYS

DIFFRACTING RUMI
On Becoming Human
by Annouchka Bayley

THE SONG BECOMES EVERYTHING
Kanai Das Baul and the Path of Longing
by Surat Lozowick

LETTER PRESSING
by Mary Gossy

[/threecol_one] [threecol_one]

INTERVIEWS

HEART OF THE MATTER
Interview with Tiokasin Ghosthorse
by Sholeh Johnston

BEYOND MATERIALISM
Interview with Bernardo Kastrup
by Neil Johnston

 

CULTUREWATCH

ZIKR: A SUFI REVIVAL
Virtual Journeys Into the Nature of Reality
Interview with Gabo Arora
by Sholeh Johnston

[/threecol_one] [threecol_one_last]

POETRY

THE CREED OF DRUNKENNESS
by Alireza Nurbakhsh

HOW COULD I KNOW
by Jalaluddin Rumi

HIDDEN COMPANIONS
by Roger Loff

NAMELESS
by Elif Sezen

MAY MY SOUL BE A TEMPLE
by Marina Featherstone

FIREFLIES
by Jeni Couzyn

 

COVER ARTWORK

FRONT OUTSIDE
FRONT INSIDE
BACK INSIDE
© Razaq Vance

BACK OUTSIDE
SUFI Journal Ad

CONTRIBUTORS

ARTISTS & PHOTOGRAPHERS

EDITORS’ NOTE

NIMATULLAHI SUFI CENTERS

[/threecol_one_last]

96 Zikr A Sufi Revival

Zikr: A Sufi Revival
Virtual Journeys Into the Nature of Reality

Interview with Gabo Arora

Interviewed by Sholeh Johnston

Gabo Arora is an award-winning immersive artist, filmmaker and Co-founder/Creative Director of TomorrowNeverKnows™, a content, technology and research studio founded by the industry’s leading creative pioneers and entrepreneurs focused exclusively on emerging technologies currently known as Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). He is also a professor at Johns Hopkins University, where he designed and leads the new Immersive Storytelling and Emerging Technology (ISET) program and lab.

Created with John Fitzgerald and Matthew Niederhauser, in collaboration with fellow technology studios Sensorium and Superbright, Arora’s latest immersive documentary, Zikr: A Sufi Revival, takes four participants on an interactive, virtual reality journey into a world of ecstatic ritual and music alongside members of the Tunisian Sufi group Association de la Renaissance du Maalouf et du Chant Soufi de Sidi Bou Saïd. By opening up an experience to Sufism through dance and song it aims to introduce participants to a heart-centered practice of inclusion, acceptance, art, joy and understanding.

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
Thank you for joining us Gabo. Can you tell us a bit about your background, and how you came to work on immersive documentaries? I was a Senior Policy Advisor to Secretary Ban Ki-moon at the United Nations, and became their first Creative Director. I founded UNVR, their virtual reality app, through which I made many of the earliest documentaries using this new medium. Since my time at the UN I’ve continued to push the boundaries with what these immersive technologies can do to tell documentary stories that get people to relate to far-off places and to issues. Recently, I’ve done a documentary on the Holocaust; in Zikr, as you know, we’re talking about Sufism; and most recently I’ve done a piece on the bombing of Hiroshima and testimonies from survivors there. It’s a rare time now in which an artist can have their palette completely expand every month with the emergence of new technologies and new ways of telling stories.

I never saw humanitarian work as a career. I saw it as a calling to make a difference. Before the UN, I was in the NGO sector and worked as a grassroots humanitarian. I was in Colombia with an organization called Peace Brigades International which was nominated for a Peace Prize in 2001, where I chose to do a lot of direct action—I was literally a human shield. So when I started my UN career, I was critical of the UN, and I realized I was only going to do it if I could do something extraordinary with that sort of power and privilege. And I think I did—it allowed for VR to be used for social good which wasn’t happening at the time.

My first documentary, Clouds Over Sidra, led to Oculus VR for Good being founded. I worked with HTC to set up their VR for Impact program as well, and these investments have been made because they saw the success of those early UN documentaries. They also increase donations—Clouds Over Sidra famously continues to double donations across the world in face-to-face, on the street fundraising. But to get this impact it has to be a good film, not just VR. It’s about good and honest storytelling. To be really creative you have to take risks, you have to be a little edgy. Now, like at the last Tribeca Film Festival and Sundance, there’s a huge appetite for people to use new tech to connect us to our common humanity because that was the original promise of the internet.

What is so powerful for you about immersive storytelling, particularly for addressing both the current and historic issues that you mention? I studied philosophy and film since I was very young, and I have always felt this desire to create. And I think there’s always this tension between form and content—each new generation, in order to be taken seriously, has to be original. It can be inspired by the past, and for me that was literature from 19th-century Russia and also cinema from the 60s and 70s, but I knew I had to do something that was going to be new. So, when I was exposed to VR I immediately felt that the form I was looking for to express myself had found me, or I found it, and the excitement was in being able to tell stories in a way that had never been possible before—you get to be in a story, you get to interact with a story, you get to shift your perspective in ways that traditional mediums like cinema don’t do. So, a lot of my work is neither cinema nor a video game, but it’s a merger of those two or a new iteration of those two mediums.

The question of dealing with historical or current topics is a good one, because it’s not always evident that a story or topic will lend itself well to VR, AR or interactive approaches. For example, with my experience on the Holocaust, The Last Goodbye, there was an enormous amount of pushback out of fear that somehow my work would trivialize or “gamify” the Holocaust. There were similar concerns with Zikr, for something that is quite a serious, spiritual topic. That is definitely a challenge and a valid concern, and it’s something that has motivated me, because I know that when you get it right you can provide a new sensation and experience for a person that they would never have had before. Regarding Zikr, so much about Sufism cannot be understood rationally, it has to be through participation, and VR technologies are, by their nature, participatory. You have to engage in order for something to reveal itself to you.

Many of the topics you work with are somewhat political in nature, so what was it that drew you to telling the story of Sufism? A lot of my other work up to that point didn’t necessarily directly relate to my own personal experience. In fact I would shy away from that—I’ve always been very curious about other people and other cultures. I like to have the naiveté of someone who is looking at things with fresh eyes. I was commissioned by Steven Spielberg and the Shoah Foundation to make The Last Goodbye, and I’m not Jewish, my family has not suffered from the Holocaust, but I think that brings an understanding of the common humanity that we have to make everyone else care about those issues. I don’t think you need to be Jewish or have gone through that to have empathy.

Now Zikr was really a calling. During my filming of The Last Goodbye with Pincus Gunter, who was a Holocaust survivor, and Steven Spielberg whose foundation did a lot of work against Islamophobia, both were alarmed by what has been happening throughout Europe with the migration crisis. I was really struck how Pincus saw parallels between that and the Holocaust, and I thought: okay, how can we figure out a way to deal with Islamophobia? And this is where my personal history came in.

I grew up in a Hindu family, and my parents have dealt with the results of religious persecution and a lot of tensions with Islam. I grew up with these biases, and what really helped alleviate them was my exposure to Sufism—through music, attending shrines, and the philosophy of Sufism. So I thought, maybe the personal part of me can come out for the first time. I didn’t pick Sufism on the subcontinent though, it was Sufism in Tunisia, which still allowed me to have a different perspective and a heightened curiosity that I wouldn’t have had otherwise.

Tell us more about the Sufi group, Association de la Renaissance du Maalouf et du Chant Soufi de Sidi Bou Saïd—how did you develop a relationship and the trust to participate in and film something that was probably quite intimate for them? That’s a really good point and one that I try to make—the rituals in Zikr are not meant for audiences or voyeurs, they are meant only for participants. The only reason the community of Sufis that I eventually worked with agreed, is that we really let them know what the technology was doing. We showed them VR in an education process to build trust and reassure them that this was not going to be a flat film on YouTube, but that we are allowing someone to become a virtual digital participant, and that the aim is the same as in real life: to open your heart, to be vulnerable, for this music and the vibrations to allow you to experience an elevated state. And as a result of that, they were excited and opened up.

I encountered the group in a very serendipitous manner. I was in Libya working with the UN to do some training and I just asked people: what’s interesting here if I was to make a VR documentary? And one of my colleagues, who’s an Associate Producer of the experience, told me that there’s a revival of Sufism and he knew some groups and could invite me to meet them. I met them and participated in rituals first and was able to build their trust by being very into it, and then slowly over a series of trips we were able to meet more people and understand the community better. The thing that we’re most proud of is that we were able to gain the trust of women’s groups as well, because I think that story about the empowerment of Sufism from a feminine perspective is neglected in Islam.

The documentary merges ritual with interviews, so you have this ability to hear and understand directly from people what Sufism means in their own lives, and why it’s their chosen path. It was a huge learning process. It’s not easy because they’re not performing, they’re more interested in doing the rituals, so some of that works well with what we’re trying to capture, and other times it was more difficult.

And for those who haven’t experienced the film, can you walk us through how it works and how that entrance into the ritual is set up through the VR experience? I’m interested in how that invitation into a genuine spiritual experience is made, when so often these rituals are relational and defined by their context. Yeah, we take that very seriously—it’s called “onboarding” where you’re able to bring people into a physical space and get them to wear the headsets.

In our installation at Sundance and in its current form, we play an actual zikr, which is a recitation of the Qur’an in a layered, repetitive, drone-like way, through the speakers in the physical environment before you have your experience. So people come into the space and they’re already feeling like they’re going to enter into something different. They take off their shoes. They stand on a carpet. What’s most interesting about the experience is that it uses the latest and greatest of avatar science, a field which studies the effects of having digital bodies.

You have to experience Zikr with three other people—it’s not a singular or alienating experience. There are four headsets in a circle and that’s how the experience starts. You have sensors on your hands, and controllers in your hands, and immediately as you go into the experience you realize that you have this effervescent body made out of particles, and you can see other people as you begin as well. Avatar science explores human relationships and emotion, and the abstract relationship of connecting with people even when they don’t have real bodies. You can feel their essence through a digital space, and you start having different cognations of what your relationship is to the stage, place and story.

You then realize that you are connected to all the people you’re doing the ritual with through virtual beads, prayer beads that connect you. And what’s fascinating with the physics of virtual spaces is that even though the bead rope is not physically in your hand connecting you, your brain automatically thinks you have a connection to these other people. When you move the beads they seem to have an elasticity that makes you want to continue to move your hands, and as you do that you light up other avatars and the world of where you are.

Slowly, that takes you into the experience. It’s a merger of 360° video and then being in the “otherworldly” spaces where you connect as avatars. Sometimes you have virtual instruments, so you can play along, and as you move you start changing and influencing a lot of what you’re experiencing. I know what I’m saying sounds a little crazy, but you have to trust me that it actually makes a lot more sense when you do it. It’s much more than just listening to music and watching people. You actually feel your presence and the presence of others.

It sounds fascinating. You’re playing with this idea of virtual reality and a kind of ‘particalized’ presence, which in itself is like a metaphor for a real trance state or ritual environment. There’s something really interesting about how the technology works and the kind of world it’s inviting you into, and maybe what it says about the nature of reality. Has that been part of your thinking? Yeah, I think it has. We didn’t want it to be too ‘on the nose’ but subtle and abstract enough that we allow the subconscious to guide us in some ways. I think it’s important for it to be instinctual and not a rational understanding of what that state is like. It’s a representation and there are definitely elements of the experience that are trying to illicit a deeper state. But I was very sensitive to the risk of doing this in ways that people would associate visually with psychedelic drug culture. I had read this New Yorker article as we were making it about the de-Islamization of Sufism in the West, specifically with Colman Barks’ translation of Rumi’s poems, so I wanted to avoid this to make sure to stay true to the Sufi troupe’s own story. I wanted it to be something that these Sufi troupes could use themselves to get people excited about Sufism in their own country. So, the story and design are within what they feel comfortable with as an Islamic practice. It’s subtle, but we’ve tried not to trivialize it.

What are some of the responses that you’ve had from people encountering the installation? The best response I got—and there have been many of them—was: “I needed that.” [both laugh] There was a Vice journalist who started exploring Sufism and seeking Sufi groups in New York. A group of white guys from Colorado were like, “If this is Islam, sign me up!” [laughs] That’s cool because it means that fundamentally people enjoy it. People feel lighter. They feel enthralled not only by the music, but it’s almost like a massage for their soul.

When I was working on it I got slightly criticized—people would say, “Are you trying to convert people?” I said, what are you afraid of? If you want to convert, why is that a bad thing? I think there is something in Zikr that gets people excited to realize that there is something more to Islam that was being hidden from them given our political and geopolitical relationships, where we were born, or our histories. Not being from the Islamic faith, I felt a strong sense of wonder that there was more there, that for reasons of my own biases, or my own culture, I was preventing myself from accessing the greater truth. I think a lot of people were getting a glimpse of something that they can then go deeper with in their own practice.

Generally as an artist there is often this imperative to be secular and objective, to not give privilege to religion, but I think that’s a mistake in some ways. My second documentary at the UN was called Waves of Grace. It was about the Ebola crisis and the story of a survivor, and I got a lot of flak because we decided to focus it on her prayer to God. At the UN, which is the church for secular fundamentalism, people would say “you can’t evoke religion,” and I’d reply that, well, religion is part of people’s lives. Why don’t we allow them to express how they would really express themselves in real life? Why are we afraid of religion? I know religion has done a lot of damage in the world, but it is also a source of inspiration and faith and hope. Maybe we don’t truly understand what religion is. I think that in America, in the West, in the world, we’re not getting that relationship right, because we tend to close off dialogue with anyone that evokes something that feels unscientific. I think there’s a deeper truth to be explored, and this is the first step in understanding what that is.

Yes, the political complications around religion create a lot of fear that can block our capacity to understand each other on a much more fundamental level, and also reach for the things in our experience which might be different on the surface, but fundamentally and universally similar. So it’s interesting to hear how, rather than presenting information, you are offering an experience which is not appealing directly to the intellect, but appealing to the body and the subtle mind in a different way, which perhaps is opening doors that aren’t initially possible through direct or political dialogue. Yes, exactly, and most people become religious because of some mystical experience, right? People can negate it, but that sense of awe is still such a strong part of human experience. With virtual reality the tools are still developing, there are a lot of issues, but I couldn’t think of a better use of the technology—it gets us closer to mystical experience than any other format I can think of. In film they say “show, don’t tell,” and I think VR allows people to “be.” A great VR experience makes you lose yourself so that you actually think you’re in a different world and you feel a sense of presence in another place. That is powerful and spiritual to me on so many levels.

Thank you for taking time, Gabo. Thank you.
[/wcm_restrict]

PHOTO © ZIKR MEDIA 360 ZAHROUNI COURTESY OF SENSORIUM
PHOTO © BETTORODRIGUES | BIGSTOCKPHOTO.COM
PHOTO © COURTESY OF SENSORIUM

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
RETURN TO ISSUE 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS
[/wcm_restrict] [wcm_nonmember]
To read this article in full, you must Buy Digital Subscription, or log in if you are a subscriber.
[/wcm_nonmember]

96 Fireflies

[twocol_one]

 

 

 

PHOTO © RADIM SCHREIBER / FIREFLY EXPERIENCE

[/twocol_one] [twocol_one_last]

“First is the journey from God,
then the journey to God.
Last is the journey in God.”
—Sufi tradition

Fireflies

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]

Crossing a field in darkness
we slid into like
delicious swimming

feeling our way without eyes
sifting strands of dark
like falling butterflies

we found a hedge alight
with fireflies
drops of light

like crazy raindrops
skittering
in all directions.

We wanted to see those
dancers of light, imagined them
white-winged,

holding their lanterns high,
plunged our fists into thorns
captured worms.

That might have been the moment
I lost you,
encountered

a dual world
knew myself
separate from the sun.

I began the journey back
to find you, toiling upstream
on rivers of light

in my rowing-boat-body
didn’t notice the rivers
were your veins

your arteries
sun rising and setting
blink of your eye.

[/wcm_restrict]
JENI COUZYN
[/twocol_one_last] [wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
RETURN TO ISSUE 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS
[/wcm_restrict] [wcm_nonmember]
To read this poem in full, you must Buy Digital Subscription, or log in if you are a subscriber.
[/wcm_nonmember]

96 May My Soul Be A Temple

[twocol_one]

PHOTO © SALLY BANFILL

[/twocol_one] [twocol_one_last]

may my soul be a temple

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]

May my hands be like the gentle wind,
caressing you with softness.
May my hair be like a blanket of spun gold,
keeping you warm.
May my tears be like oceans waves,
cleansing you of your burdens.
May my eyes be like galaxies,
bringing you wonder and delight.
May my lips be like roses,
gently healing your wounds.
May my voice be like celestial music,
moving you to dance into eternity.
May my scent be like the fragrance of heaven,
enveloping you in sweetness.
May my face be like the sun,
giving you light and life.
May my heart be like a lighthouse,
guiding you home.
May my soul be a place of worship,
so you may forever be with the very essence
of God.

[/wcm_restrict]
MARINA FEATHERSTONE
[/twocol_one_last]
[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
RETURN TO ISSUE 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS
[/wcm_restrict]

[wcm_nonmember]
To read this poem in full, you must Buy Digital Subscription, or log in if you are a subscriber.
[/wcm_nonmember]

96 Letter Pressing

Letter Pressing

By Mary Gossy

 

A legible message made of words is a text. That word, “text” comes from the same root as “textile,” and it has to do with weaving. One strand, one word crosses another, and then there is a phrase, and the phrases tie together into thicker webs of meaning, until a fabric of text is made, made by hand, whether by moving a stylus over impressionable material, like a chisel into stone, or a pen over paper, or fingers over a keyboard of some kind or another. Even electrons leave traces. That’s one reason that circuits heat up. Text comes always from some form of typing even if it flows from ink out of a quill onto parchment. Moving the shuttle across the warp and woof takes force, and so does spinning, and all that movement makes friction and heat. Weaving hands and typing go together in very particular ways. “Type” comes from the Greek “typto,” which means, “I strike.” If you have ever used a mechanical typewriter you know this, because it can take a good deal of force to get the key to smack the ribbon hard enough to mark the paper beneath with the reverse of whichever letter you have chosen. “Typos” originally meant “the mark of a blow,” in the sense of a bruise or wound. Later it means a stamp struck by a die. And then later it can mean example, or copy, or pattern, and today, read in English, it means blows that have struck in the wrong places, printed letters mixed up, misplaced, absent. It’s what our text messages are full of, typos, the marks where our touches miss.

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
A monastery is a place to run across words with this kind of intensity. There the practice is lectio divina, or holy reading, a process likened to a cow chewing its cud. Reading very slowly, doing anything to read as slowly as possible, reading one letter at a time, reading one word over and over, reading in a language one does not know well at all, with a dictionary—anything to slow down the process of expectation—“I know what this means—I know what this is going to say”—so that an opening can happen, when a word or a short phrase, possibly one that the reader has seen or heard many times before, can strike—there is type again. The reader feels the word striking at the heart of things, and the practice is to stop then, and to listen—to feel—to let the word in. It is for Christians the voice of the Spirit. Possibly what is most striking about it is the way this word gets into the body after the blow of its newness, revealed by the slow reading. Anyone who says this kind of practice is a way of getting away from the body and its needs and wants hasn’t ever been in it—meaning a demanding mystical practice, one that takes full, slow, patient attention and a turning from all random thoughts and wishes. It happens with the whole being, “slowly, slowly,” as Dr. Javad Nurbakhsh, late master of the Nimatullahi Sufi Order, has it in one of his poems:

Say continually the name of the Friend,
slowly, slowly;
with this alchemy change the copper
of the heart into gold
slowly, slowly.

This practice of gently and slowly letting the word open the being to reality makes for full embodiment. Everything about mysticism highlights the body and the fact that feeling the whole of one’s body is necessary in every way imaginable in order to experience and manifest God. The five physical senses have the opportunity, salved and trained by silence and visual spareness, to rest and then to reawaken to a new world of depth and intensity of sensation, always both carnal and divine.

Being enclosed, in a space or a practice or both, makes you touch everything inside and out of you; the kingdom of heaven within and without touches itself in you.

As so much poetry indicates, this happens metaphorically and literally in gardens and orchards. At a cloistered Oxford convent some of the apple trees are a hundred years old, as old as the place, put there by the first nuns. Fruit tree specialists from the university have visited the trees because some are ancient varieties, almost extinct—almost but not quite eradicated by the uniformity enforced by economies of scale that corporate agriculture has imposed. What is left is alive in difference. The apples have ancient English names. The names sound like the first fruits of the amalgamation of Norman French and Anglo-Saxon. The trees are a lot of work and most of the nuns can’t climb into them anymore to pick the apples, or to prune the branches. Picking is hard but intoxicating. You have a ladder and a canvas shoulder bag for the apples, and up and up you go, picking from the top down, resisting the temptation to skip to the easy ones, reaching, reaching for what’s ripe, regardless. The bees don’t always want to share, but gentle movement makes room for everybody. Your head is sticking out the top of the tree. You come down carefully because you can’t see through the tight branches. Feel your way, you are much wider now because of the over-full shoulder bag of apples. Down you go, to the little cart, there actually is something called an applecart, and into it you carefully, but not exactingly, which is the adverbial subtlety of monasticism, place the apples. Then up again you go. For now, before Vespers, the apples, and there are lots of them all at once, need picking. Not just one apple, many of them, and no biting, not until supper, or breakfast.

There has to be a touch for every need. Not every touch is right every time, and sometimes no touching is best, most healing, most loving.

Nuns take good care of apples the way winemakers take good care of grapes. Apples need curing the way hams do.  So at the end of that afternoon’s picking you roll the cart to the apple store, which is not somewhere to buy things. It is somewhere to put things aside until they are ready, because ripening takes place at its own pace on the dark shelves after the bright branches. Some of the September apples won’t be ready to eat until Christmas; it takes that long for their sugars to sweeten, for their flesh to conform to its right firmness, for the sour to prepare to angle itself along where it will streak the tongue.

Picking makes you stretch, storing makes you bend. The shelves go all the way down to the floor, and they are a meter, or more than three feet, deep. The apples go all the way back, and are stacked on each other, pyramidally, with a sheet of newspaper in between. This is hard work; you have to fold yourself in half so that you can get to the back of the shelf.

All that work can get to be too much, and so the worker might find a secluded spot and just lie down and watch the sky for a while, and then, all of a sudden, an ecstasy might swoon over the whole body with the word, first with memories of love long past, and then with the full pressure of the present moment.

Why anyone should be surprised is surprising. The stories in the Gospels, for example, are full of touching. All anybody ever does is touch, touch, touch. Jesus they touch like crazy. Sometimes the touch surprises him, but mostly he wants it, he’s asking for it. Doubting Thomas, testing his master in his master’s supposed absence, said, “Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe.” The word King James’s translators made “print” is “typon,” that mark of a blow, the wound, the hole in the body like a door. But when Jesus literally walks through the locked door between them, in response to the amazement on Thomas’s face Jesus says, Touch me. Put your hand in the holes. Touch the the wound, the type; print: read: come in.

Christ is all about touching, and the touching heals.

There has to be a touch for every need. Not every touch is right every time, and sometimes no touching is best, most healing, most loving. But sooner or later touching has to happen again. Talking about touching doesn’t do the trick, and writing about it is only bearable because it takes touching to write, even if spoken words go into a recorder and are converted into electronic light on a magnet. A cord in a throat had to vibrate and imprint itself somewhere, somehow, so that later the sound could come again and make an eardrum beat, or glow into somebody’s eye. The device gets warm, after a while, in your hands, whether sending a message or awaiting one. The message can land like a blow, after all, and the endless waiting for a desired communication can circle in the brain like a vulture over the watchful half-darkened eye of an immobile animal not yet gone. Type is a serious matter for bodies. Wounded bodies are bruised with typing that marks out the text of their traumas. Jesus responded to Thomas with a famous answer that bears repeating: “Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing.” More touching, this time by way of an invitation to feel for yourself, to follow the trail of the marks and to find their sense.

After the nails and the spear there are openings forever after in the body of the Christ, five places at least where a lover’s body in doubt can feel for itself the body of the beloved the lover thought it had lost, and in losing that beloved body, felt it had lost a whole world.  But then it just takes one finger to come across the abyss of separation, tapping into the wound, “beholding,” that is, seeing by feeling, that message of presence, touch-typing a text of connection between bodies that arcs a bolt of love between and all around as you reach your hand forward and thrust it into the side, reaching the seat of mercy. This is the proximity of God. The faith to get there is really the grace of a little leap across a synapse that makes a finger move, and that faith is how we read and meet each other in the whorls. That one word, “typon,” in a language barely understood, like one thin skein in a labyrinth, can lead to text, and reading, and contact with truth. To telegraph is what we do when we text: we write across distance, through the ether. There is a way to get there: following the path, sensing the typos, feeling the way, slowly. And when it’s time to make a move, as sheikh Paul Weber was fond of saying, forget just one tentative finger, or even one timid hand: “jump in with both feet.”

NOTES:
1 This text is excerpted and adapted from Enclosure, © Mary Gossy, 2009/2018
2 “The Name of the Friend,” Javad Nurbakhsh, M.D., Divan-E Nurbakhsh, New York, 2014.

[/wcm_restrict]
PHOTO © ANNAFILL28 – PIXABAY.COM

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
RETURN TO ISSUE 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS
[/wcm_restrict] [wcm_nonmember]
To read this article in full, you must Buy Digital Subscription, or log in if you are a subscriber.
[/wcm_nonmember]

96 Beyond Materialism

BEYOND MATERIALISM

An Interview with Bernardo Kastrup

By Neil Johnston

Bernardo Kastrup is a metaphysical philosopher with a PhD in Computer Engineering, specializing in artificial intelligence and reconfigurable computing. He has worked in some of the world’s foremost research laboratories, including the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) and Philips Research, and his writings explore the “thoughtscapes” of philosophy of mind, ontology, neuroscience of consciousness, psychology, foundations of physics and philosophy of life.
He has a penchant for oxymorons and thought experiments. His published titles—Meaning in Absurdity, Dreamed up Reality, Rationalist Spiritualty, More than Allegory, Brief Peeks Beyond, and Why Materialism is Baloney—embody spectrums of thought and experience, always reaching for something beyond the “known” that calls to be touched; the space between extremes that paves a middle way into a fruitful no man’s land of “metaphysical speculation.”

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]

Neil Johnston: In your book Why Materialism is Baloney you’ve mounted a rigorous challenge to materialism as being the principal ontology underpinning mainstream western philosophy. Is it possible to outline the basis of your challenge? Materialism or mainstream physicalism, as it is technically called, is based on the concept of matter as the ontological primitive, in other words, a real entity, something of substance, something that exists, but it exists outside and independent of consciousness. According to materialists, particular arrangements of matter somehow generate consciousness and the contents of experience. However, matter outside consciousness is not an empirical fact. It’s not available to us as such. The only thing that is available to us is perception, and perception is mental in nature, not material. This idea of matter as something independent of consciousness is only an explanatory model. It tries to answer this question: If this world isn’t outside consciousness, how come we are all sharing perceptions of the same world?

Ok. But the overriding influence of materialism has profoundly shaped modern civilization. Yes, but is materialism the cause or is it a reflection of a development in the psychology of Western civilization that led both to certain materialist tendencies and to an articulation of a worldview—the philosophy of materialism—to justify those tendencies? On the face of it, materialism is so absurd that it’s impossible for me to believe that it has won out purely on the basis of the soundness of its argument. Materialism in a nutshell basically means the following: my mind conceptualizes something—namely, matter—within itself; it then claims this matter to be outside itself; it then points at this matter and says “I am that!” I mean, it’s completely outrageous, it’s absurd and it fails to explain the only thing that we actually know for sure, which is the qualities of experience. And yet it has become the mainstream narrative about the nature of reality.

Meanwhile, the materialist tenets that deny universal consciousness are set against the study and experience of consciousness by diverse numbers of traditions—a whole religious, spiritual, and cultural canon which presupposes an awareness of human consciousness and its relationship to universal consciousness. Yes, this awareness precedes materialism by millennia, it’s thousands of years old. So, materialism is a very new kid on the block. I don’t think it’s going to survive very long. As a matter of fact, I think it’s collapsing right now. [laughs.]

The thing about religious and spiritual traditions is that they employ metaphor rather than pseudo philosophic/scientific analysis to identify the existence of human self-consciousness and its relation to universal consciousness. Your book Why Materialism is Baloney, has a very powerful set of metaphors for consciousness and egoic representation in the mind which we’ll come to, but there are many others that relate to the relationship between self and universal consciousness; metaphors for essence and emptiness; mystical immersion; drop and ocean, for example. Metaphor appears in many spiritual traditions to describe ways of experiencing consciousness, where the subjective and self-conscious ego is a filtered experience of universal consciousness itself. And many practices make the conscious dissolution of the ego an overriding condition of experiencing universal consciousness. In Sufism for example, that relationship is present through the Lover/Beloved motif which introduces an emotional force of love. The Lover/ego-consciousness falls in love with the Beloved/universal consciousness, a process of emotional attraction to a non-self-consciousness that reduces ego-consciousness. So, the question is: how does this emotional/feeling correspondence between self-consciousness and universal consciousness relate to your theory of consciousness? You talked about metaphors. Indeed, I make liberal use of metaphors as do the world’s spiritual traditions because they convey knowledge by acquaintance, a mental gestalt, not merely to convince you that something is conceptually right. A conceptual model is something indirect. You may be convinced the model is correct, and still not know by acquaintance what the implication of that model is. Søren Kierkegaard, the Danish philosopher, used to say that you can build a conceptual system, but so long as you don’t inhabit the system you built, you are like an architect who builds a castle and lives in the barn outside. And I think that’s a great metaphor, there you go…

It’s a great metaphor. Science is also operating in terms of metaphors. The only difference is that it does not recognize what it does as metaphoric. While the world’s spiritual traditions are very open about it and they say this is just a metaphor, we are trying to point to the moon, but don’t look at the finger, look to the moon, materialism is saying the moon is in the finger because it isn’t a metaphor, it’s literally true, there is no “moon” outside the finger. This is, if you will forgive my English, bullshit. It’s complete nonsense. In the philosophy of science we have this movement called anti-realism and what it does is to deny literalism. According to anti-realism, what science does is to build “as-if” models. Take, for example, things not immediately available to experience, like an electron. You never see an electron. You see the consequences of the behavior of a so-called electron on a computer screen or on a photographic plate or on a sensor somewhere, but the electron itself is just an abstract theoretical entity. All we can assert is that nature behaves as if electrons existed. Nature behaves as if electromagnetic waves vibrated in a complete vacuum. Nature behaves as if atoms had a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons, but, according to anti-realism, these are not literal entities, these are metaphorical entities. In my own philosophy, I use an aquatic metaphor.

Whirlpools… You talk about drops and oceans; I like to talk about whirlpools in the stream. I think that we, as living creatures, are like whirlpools in a stream. Whirlpools are processes of localization in the flow of water, right? You can point at the whirlpool and say “here is a whirlpool.” You can delineate its boundaries. Yet there is nothing to the whirlpool but the stream itself. It’s just water in movement, not a separate entity. It’s just a local pattern of behavior of the stream and I think that’s what living beings are, local patterns of dissociated behavior of universal consciousness. You can point at a living being and say “look, here are the boundaries, here is me, there I am,” and you can trace the boundaries of a human body just like you can trace the boundaries of a whirlpool. Yet, according to my metaphor, there is nothing to the whirlpool but the stream: universal consciousness. In that sense, the ego and universal consciousness are not separate. The local pattern entails dissociation, this illusion of separation between the ego and the rest, the lover and the Beloved. And it’s intrinsic to the nature of consciousness that, when it becomes dissociated from an aspect of itself, it misses that which is no longer available to conscious acquaintance and the missing of that and the consequent feeling, could be called love. The lover yearning for the Beloved is a direct consequence, in my metaphor, of the dissociated whirlpool longing for the rest of the stream. It forgets that there is nothing but the stream itself. The moment the dissociation is over, the “lover” reencounters the “Beloved.”

Now, this implies “heart,” or feeling, an emotional relationship between lover and Beloved. In materialism, emotion is not considered to be a critical part of the philosophic experience. But there is specific emotional content in the relationship between self and universal consciousness—a yearning—and this suggests a correspondence, it suggests a means of communication almost. I understand you. Our emotions are integral to our psychic faculties and by trying to carve them out and throw them away we are mutilating ourselves. Why are we going to handicap ourselves by committing emotional-mutilation? It’s like cutting off a leg or an arm and expecting it to be as efficient as if we hadn’t done that. It’s nonsense.

That’s my point, we live in an emotional/feeling experience and without it there would be no experience of a living context. I think emotion ultimately drives everything, and I don’t mean only human history. I think the force we call emotion might drive the process of dissociation at a universal level. In the process of forming ‘whirlpools,’ there might be an inherent yearning for an ‘other’ because if there is no dissociation, no whirlpools, there is only the one stream. There is no other, and the emotional force—loneliness?—associated with that may be so strong that it ultimately creates a process of dissociation. Once that process takes root then you have, in turn, the longing for what has been lost…

Okay. …the yearning for the other part of self that is now separated from Itself, and this drives philosophical movements, religions, everything.

So, without the longing, the yearning, there would be no expression of need or desire, there would be no spirituality, no Vedas. It’s a profoundly important point. But how do you account for the presence of feeling and its sensory impact within consciousness and the brain? I see all experiences as excitations of consciousness and the metaphorical images of that.

Emotional experiences are closest to the innate dispositions of consciousness. In other words, they reflect pure psychic energy, the motivational drive that makes consciousness vibrate or get excited in the first place.

Including the emotional? Surely.

Okay. This is not often stated, Bernardo. Ultimately, emotions are phenomena sensed in consciousness, these are experiences, right? And there are different categories of experience. Some are perceptual, some intuitive, some intellectual, and some are highly emotional. There is a feeling aspect to certain experiences that could be pure emotion. But I do see them all as excitations of consciousness. Different chords or tones. Emotional experiences are closest to the innate dispositions of consciousness. In other words, they reflect pure psychic energy, the motivational drive that makes consciousness vibrate or get excited in the first place. They are the first level of differentiation from a purely non-excited consciousness, if the latter can be said to exist. Emotion is the first manifestation of pure potentiality and it reflects primordial drives, the primordial energy that gets everything into movement. But it’s nonetheless still an excitation of consciousness in so far as we only know it because we experience it.

It would seem that this feeling of loss and longing, this yearning, is fundamental to the human condition. Sure. Most human yearnings are yearnings to transcend limitations, the limitations inherent to the human condition. In other words, the limitations we have as seemingly separate beings. What is adrenaline-seeking behavior, for instance, but an attempt to transcend the limitations of the human condition? So yes, I am with you that yearning is behind everything and it expresses itself in many different words, tonalities, colors and forms, but the underlying force is the same.

It’s almost layered in that… Absolutely…

… layers of yearning are interconnected states encompassing the needs and desires for everything from the basic to the profound. And as you go through those layers, those states, then the desire for material stuff diminishes, becomes less satisfying? Materialism does not survive direct experience of transcendence.

I’ll quote that…[laughs] So, whoever is a materialist has not had that direct experience yet. That’s for sure.

Consciousness also often infers a wide range of feelings and positive human attributes associated with it: compassion, empathy, intuition, kindness, joy; could we say that consciousness is inherently a “good thing” with regard to its own behavior? The list of associated states that you just made—compassion, empathy, intuition, kindness, joy, love, these are all positive experiences, positive feelings, positive values, so to say. And I think they all exist, of course they all exist, we experience them, but I think they are not any less valid, in the sense of not being any less real, than anger, sadness, frustration, despair, angst and the whole gamut of what we call negative feelings, negative emotions. But let me clarify one point. My original point was that normal patterns of brain activity correspond to dissociation in universal consciousness, the whirlpool in the stream. If that dissociation were to reduce so that we would become more conscious of what is beyond the boundaries of our personal self, then those normal patterns of brain activity should be replaced with reduced brain activity. So if dissociation reduces, then brain activity should reduce as well, and it turns out that scientifically, empirically, that’s what’s observed. But this is all completely agnostic of the kind of experience that you have, whether it’s compassion or anger, whether it’s empathy or hate—these are all experiences, mental activities whose extrinsic appearance is certain patterns of brain activity. The latter are what the experiences look like from a second person perspective; in other words, from across the dissociative boundary. So I was very agnostic of positive and negative when I made that analogy. I am not sure that negative emotions are any less or more conducive to dissociation than positive emotions.

Despite the shortcomings of religious institutions through the ages, religion was humanity’s way to give words to an inner intuition, an inner perception of what is real.

Isn’t there a different kind of coherence to a state of meditation as opposed to a state of negative emotional excitement? What I can say is this: the moment I make this analogy between experiences and excitations, or vibrations of consciousness, I’m opening the door for consciousness to exist without experience. In other words, if experiences are like the vibrations of a guitar string, then nothing stops the guitar string from existing even when it’s not vibrating. Experiences are nothing but consciousness in motion, so consciousness may exist without experiences. And I think that’s what you’re driving to in a state of meditation; that you eliminate the excitation, reduce the vibrations. You meditate to experience the string itself. But if the string were to stop completely and be in absolute repose, then nothing would be experienced. So the fact that people can reflect on the great void in the Buddhist tradition for instance, or refer to accounts of pure consciousness that recur in all traditions of the world, they cannot be talking about consciousness in absolute repose because there is nothing to say about it. Perhaps what is happening is that they experience a fundamental tone, a single vibration, a carrier wave, if you will, of universal consciousness, which is always there underneath ordinary experiences.

The om. Exactly. An om that’s intrinsic to the string, and all other experiences are modulations of that basic tone, and if you remove the modulations, then you are left with that om. I think that is experienceable, because it is inherent to all consciousness, including the dissociated guitar string, including the dissociated whirlpools, lover and Beloved. It’s a consummate force. That’s what is experienced in deep states of meditation, but it’s completely neutral morally speaking, ethically speaking. It is not good or bad, it’s not positive or negative, it’s just the fundamental vibration of existence.

Is the sense of longing for life after death one of the planks for belief systems that seem to manifest around concepts of consciousness? I think that’s undeniable, right? And the risk of wish fulfillment and self-deception in that is obvious, it’s blatant, and one has to be very self-guarded against this kind of wish for personal immortality. But this is not the most important point. Today we are exposed to the much larger risks associated with a mainstream metaphysics that has made this amazing assertion that consciousness ends. Consciousness is the very ground of reality. Positing that it ends, is, historically speaking, an anomaly. It’s surprising. It’s abnormal. It’s an aberration. But, okay, that’s the status quo, the narrative that leads most people on the street to lose their source of meaning because they live in a cultural ethos that denies the endurance of consciousness. The concept of universal consciousness, mind, god, reflects an intuition of something real. And that’s the origin of the god concept. It wasn’t a wish fulfillment manoeuvre. Despite the shortcomings of religious institutions through the ages, religion was humanity’s way to give words to an inner intuition, an inner perception of what is real.

So, finally, there is a principal philosophic question utterly rejected in materialism: is there a purpose to consciousness, or to God? What you’re saying is that death is a kind of deconstruction and a return to universal consciousness, but what’s your view on the existential purpose of “consciousness”? Technically we call it telos—the idea that nature is guided by intent, that it’s not just random. Nature doesn’t necessarily have a complete picture of its final state but it nonetheless operates teleologically, operates with intent; it’s trying to get somewhere. I think life is a vehicle on that teleological path. Life has many negative aspects; it’s dissociation, after all. The lover loses the Beloved; they become separated through a dissociative boundary. But at the same time, living beings have the unique capacity of metacognition, the ability to self-reflect. I believe universal consciousness does not have the capacity to develop its own metacognition without these reflective, dissociative states. Life—dissociation—may thus be required for consciousness to become aware of itself, and this may be the purpose and meaning of life.

You seem to see consciousness as an evolving thing… I have to be careful here. It’s an evolution in the sense that it’s getting to know itself. But it’s not changing in the sense that it becomes something other than what it is and has always been. It’s just actualizing its potential for knowing what it is, has always been and will always be.

[/wcm_restrict]
PHOTO © VIVID CAFE | BIGSTOCKPHOTO.COM
PHOTO © PUBLIC DOMAIN
PHOTO © BALAZ5 | BIGSTOCKPHOTO.COM
PHOTO © CYMATICS.ORG

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
RETURN TO ISSUE 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS
[/wcm_restrict] [wcm_nonmember]
To read this article in full, you must Buy Digital Subscription, or log in if you are a subscriber.
[/wcm_nonmember]

96 Nameless

[twocol_one]

PHOTO/ARTWORK © ELLEN JANTZEN

[/twocol_one] [twocol_one_last]

Nameless

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]

Only a blind one can enter this room
let it be curtainless
____________________flowerless
__________spotless

 

Only a naked one can dance in this dark
only a fearless one can embrace this light-ball
let her be speechless
__________let her be nameless

 

Light the fire on heart level my dear
______________________________— let it glow
we can’t do it otherwise

 

Go to that forest you feared
do not ask why __________ just go
then come back to me
come back to me

[/wcm_restrict]
ELIF SEZEN
[/twocol_one_last]
[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
RETURN TO ISSUE 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS
[/wcm_restrict]

[wcm_nonmember]
To read this poem in full, you must Buy Digital Subscription, or log in if you are a subscriber.
[/wcm_nonmember]

96 The Song Becomes Everything

The Song Becomes Everything

Kanai Das Baul and the Path of Longing

by Surat Lozowick

No fear in singing

Why are you afraid? We’re scattered in a circle, trying to match the melody that Kanai Das Baul sends high into the air, like a bird sent far then called back, sending messages to that which made us, returning with wisdom to share. His voice flies clear, straight, true: melody simple yet beautifully precise.

Night descends, darkness and a slight chill coming through open barn walls, cloth ceiling above us breathing with the wind. Kanai Das Baul, “Kanai Da,” sits attentively at the front, lit by LED lights, ektara (a single-stringed drone instrument) in one hand, ankle bracelet in the other.

“Oh Brother, my Beloved Friend,” he sings in Bengali, to Krishna, “when the bird of breath escapes the cage of my body, spreads its wings and flies away”—when I die—“that day, will you be there, will you remember me?”

We respond, but we aren’t singing in unison. Our voices collide and wrestle in the air.

Patiently, undemanding, he sings the song again and again. He doesn’t get frustrated at our pace of learning. He gets bored. (He who at other times sits contentedly as we talk for hours in unknown words, the majority untranslated.) Tonight we’re here to learn, and we’re not paying attention.

“It’ll take time,” Arpita, translating and helping teach the song, says to him on our behalf.

“Of course it’ll take time!” he says in Bengali. “I’ve spent my whole life taking time, and I still have more to learn. But sing together.”

On the third evening, as we flap through another repetition, he stops singing.

“Why are you singing with so much fear? There’s no fear in singing.”

“In the West, everyone’s afraid of being wrong,” I answer, speaking primarily for myself.

“Why are you afraid? There’s no fear,” he says. “Open your voice. Throw the voice as far as it can go.”

We sing again. This time it’s different. “It won’t work when the voice is closed,” says Kanai Da. “If you open your voice, you’ll feel good inside, and it’ll sound good too.” We all feel it. The air, our voices thrown unreservedly into it, is more full.

Still, we are just beginning. Now, with less fear in our voices: “Sing louder!”

Wherever my ektara takes me, that is my work

Kanai Da is a Baul, a God-loving, God-singing, God-breathing minstrel who lives in Tarapith, Bengal, India, where he sings to Divine Mother Tara—singing, as his contemporary and friend Parvathy Baul says, with the Divine Mother’s own voice.

Today, alongside her and two traveling companions, he is in lumber country in the Okanagan, British Columbia, Canada, sleeping in a canvas tent under pine trees by a drought-dry stream on the Kripa Mandir ashram of healer turned Western Baul teacher Lalitha. Lalitha has gathered Bauls from India and North America to her farmland sanctuary for an exchange of teachings and songs between the two traditions, Bauls of Bengal and Western Bauls. The Western Baul tradition was founded in the United States by Lee Lozowick (born 1943, died 2010), ancient seeds in modern earth, and became associated with the Bauls of Bengal through a resonance of practices.

In bright orange robes, Kanai Da squats in the dry grass, smoking a bidi, with an empty sunflower butter jar beside him for ashes. As long as he has hot black tea, thick with sugar, and bidis, he is content: at home on the wood porch of his tent, taking in the morning sun, as he is at home on the funeral steps of Tarapith, with his friends the beggars, the tantrikas, the aghoris, the poor, the mad, the dead.

The cremation ground (smashan) of Tarapith is his “office,” he says. “I go to my office at 8 am, go home for lunch at 1 pm, return to the office at 5 pm.” His work: singing to the Divine Mother.

Sitting in the grass outside his tent one evening, I ask, “You don’t miss the office?”

“Na. Here is office. Wherever I go, that is my office. Next the airport. I come, I go, everything is the same. Wherever my ektara takes me, that is my work.”

Filled with compassion

True Bauls are hard to find, says Kanai Da. With “modern” Bauls, “their minds are functioning.” The Baul mind was once empty of thought and filled with compassion. Now, he says, there’s too much intellect.

Yet from Kanai Da, compassion shines like one lit by the golden rays of the morning sun. He carries calm rootedness in his body, roots reaching up to heaven, to bloom beauty and heart onto earth. His sixty-three years show on his wrinkled hands and his vast grey-black beard, but he lives in his own body a relationship outside of time: the eternal devotion of Lover and Beloved.

It’s not the details of his life that imprint in me an impression of who he is—it’s his voice, like earth, solid yet wildly alive; the way he claps his hands when he sings, steady, soft, deliberate; the way his hands are always active when not holding an instrument or clapping, running over each other like a farmer washing his hands after a day in the fields, a constant movement which yet leaves the calmness emanating from him untouched; the still focused attention expressed on his face; his hand pulling through his beard; his wrinkle-eyed, open-mouthed laugh.

The wisdom of one such as Kanai Da is a lived wisdom and a living wisdom. Between the countless songs and poems he carries is the simple space for life to be lived, naturally, spontaneously, fully, beautifully.

His eyes are blind, but when he squats in the grass taking in the polished-bronze light of dawn, or sits on the couch still and quiet as we gab over dinner, one suspects that he sees something most of our hearts are closed to.

In his heart, I sense, he is with his Beloved. It is her we hear him calling, tenderly, powerfully, joyfully, when he sings. In silence he is with her too. His song to her does not stop when his voice does, and the silence they share is not interrupted when it starts.

Still sitting with the Goddess

“I’ve been through a lot of hardship,” he says, “That’s why the Divine Mother has given so much happiness inside.”

Parvathy asked him once if he has pain, she tells us, and he answered:

“I started my journey. The Goddess came into my life, everyone came, and then everyone left. I’m still sitting with the Goddess.”

His guru said Kanai Da would meet many people. He said, “All the meetings will come but also leave. It’s a cycle. They will leave today but more will come tomorrow.” Thus he must not be attached. He found these words to be true. One by one his family left—some to death, others to marriage. Now, free from familial duties, he wanders around, he says, enjoying his life, accepting what is given, accepting what is taken.

One of his gurus, Gyananondo Goshai, told him not to go begging on buses and trains, as some Bauls do. “Stay in one place,” he said, “If you need anything it will come to you.” So, he stays in the “office” in Tarapith. Everything he needs does come to him, he says. He lives in a mud house, the last in the neighborhood, surrounded by modern two-story buildings. Many people help take care of him, Parvathy tells us, from other musicians to the flower sellers at the temple. In 2002, he met Canadians in India, and decided he wanted to go to Canada. Now, on Lalitha’s invitation, here he is. “My wish has been fulfilled,” he says. “Divine Mother made it so.”

Singing to survive

When Kanai Da was ten years old, his father died falling off a ladder. He, blind since a young age, was left to care for his mother and sister.

There were many Baul practitioners in the village, and they would sing every night. He would listen. He might remember only four or five lines, but he would repeat them throughout the day. People would sometimes give him money, food, or rice.

“He had no instrument,” says Parvathy, so “he took two stones and played them against each other.”

When he didn’t beg enough money to feed his family by singing in the streets, he would go to community houses. He would say openly that he couldn’t earn enough that day, and they would give him cooked food to take home. He would go to as many houses as he needed to feed his family.

He used to play in the temple in Tarapith, 9 km from his village, and was attracted by the funeral ground. As a teenager he would sometimes spend the night there.

I ask him how old he was when he began singing in the smashan, and he begins counting the years backwards to find out. But the number doesn’t mean anything to him, so he’s not sure. He says he’s been sitting there full time for at least 37 years. Parvathy thinks it’s more. (He’s 63, and has been going there since being a teenager.)

His colleagues in the funeral ground “office” used to remember how long he’d been going, he says, but now they’re all dead, so he has no one to ask. He says this matter-of-factly, with humor.

“We all want to tie and measure everything, counting days,” comments Parvathy, “for him it’s the opposite. He’s just being who he is.”

In his every word and gesture, Kanai Da sends a message: what matters is not the years of the past, but today. Today, like almost every day, he will sing the songs he’s learned, many which remind us we will die, and that only love is eternal, love for Krishna, the Dark Moon, the ungraspable eternal lover trysted in longing. Today, and every day, he shows up to his office and does his work, as he will until the “noose of the God of death,” as one song says, tightens around his neck; and then, “Dark Moon, I will know what kind of friend you are.”

“You can have beautiful language,” she explains, “but you must start with the alphabet.”

The song becomes everything

He worked hard to learn each song, he tells us. He cannot read or write, and not all his teachers were patient. Some would run away, or reject him. But he was resilient. Every song is precious, he says. “The song becomes everything. Your house, your friends, your parents, your companion, everything.”

When Kanai Da was young, his gurus would call him with compassion. “Ok, this old man is calling me, I’ll keep him company,” he would think. They would teach him wisdom and repeat poetry for him to memorize.

As he tells of his meetings with teachers, he begins reciting one of the first poems he learned. He has to finish, uninterrupted, before translation can continue, like he’s holding a scarf that cannot be taken from the weaver’s hands until the final knot is tied. It is a test for his memory. When he finishes, he is relieved. He can relax. The poem is in its proper place, complete, unbroken. Translation can continue.

He tells of Pagol Bijoy, an aghori practitioner and poet who would compose spontaneous poetry, many poems which now are preserved only in the memory of Kanai Da. “Pagol” means mad. Pagol Bijoy would speak poetry, and his assistant Horidash would write it down, then put it to music.

Pagol Bijoy was singing in the smashan in Tarapith and said he would write a song for Kanai Da. Kanai Da told him he would not remember, because his mind could not sit still and learn poetry. His mind wanted to go to the tea shop, then have a samosa. The poet said no problem. He would repeat the song 40 times if necessary.

He did repeat it nearly 40 times, says Kanai Da. And Kanai Da really wanted to go have tea, but he stayed until he’d learned the song. The poet told him to put the words to a melody. When he sang it, the poet went into ecstatic bhava, crying, and hugged him. After that, Kanai Da would visit him once a day, every day. The poet would have tears in his eyes when he arrived. He used to cry so much with love for Kanai Da that Kanai would have to leave, just so the poet could stop crying. He would speak poetry and Kanai Da would compose a melody. The poet used to scold Horidash for not composing like Kanai Da.

Song by song, he learned. Yet even with decades of songs memorized and lived, he says he is sad he can never learn all the songs there are to learn.

A daily practice, morning to night

In outer expressions of Baul culture one can see madness, spontaneity and iconoclasm, but the core of their way of life is sadhana: disciplined, committed, daily practice, of both music and esoteric methods of transformation.

“One thing I want to remind everyone, and myself also,” says Parvathy, “is that it’s a strict discipline. You must practice as a musician, and then you can transcend. But first you must practice technically.”

“You can have beautiful language,” she explains, “but you must start with the alphabet. As a child you must learn to read and write. Even speaking, you must know where to put the words. On a Baul ashram, a child born there learns the songs very naturally, almost like breathing. But when you come from a different perspective, you see that there are many steps. Even how you stand, how you breathe. It’s a daily practice, morning to night. It’s not like you practice meditation for seven hours and then you’re done. You have to practice every day.”

For one who grows up surrounded by Baul music and culture, is there an age when they could be considered a Baul? someone asks.

“Am I a Baul?” Kanai Da asks in response. “There is always more to learn, there is no end. There are infinite songs to learn. Even I am still learning to be a Baul.”

Not all Baul practitioners are performers. Some live the teaching in other ways. Yet an intensity of focus on sadhana remains core. “The music is a vehicle,” says Parvathy. “Some people sit in front of a fire; we play ektara and sing.”

You cannot run out of this gold

Parvathy emphasizes the necessity of working with a guru, a living teacher, on the Baul path. “The guru is neither man nor woman,” Parvathy says. Yet “When the guru takes a human form, he or she takes on all the human functions.” We have to see beyond this. “What is the essence the guru is carrying? That is what we will have to look for.” From how we look, our view will change, she says. “When we see the divine in him, we can start to see the divine in everyone. Even a dog. We can see a dog as our guru. See compassion in it.”

“Guru yoga is very difficult,” says Kanai Da, “so we need guru kripa, guru’s grace, to be in guru yoga. Guru kripa is a state of lightness. You cook and serve, but you don’t touch the pot, and you should not be hungry. The grace of the guru is to be completely free, even free of wanting the fruit of sadhana, of wanting to be realized. Not attached to getting something, believing if we follow obediently we’ll get something. Not wanting, just being, that’s the grace.”

Kanai Da and Parvathy attribute everything given in their lives to the grace of their gurus. They are instruments; the guru is the conductor and the orchestra.

“We must be slaves, just workers on the path,” says Kanai Da. “He is my employer, and there’s no retirement.” He laughs.

“Your guru is you,” says Parvathy. “But not in the sense of ‘I am my guru.’ The human who is sitting in front of you in the form of the guru is you.”

“If you search, you will never find the guru,” says Kanai Da. “Because he is there, he’s present with you. Searching is outside. Be with the guru, don’t search for the guru.”

“He fills your life with practice,” says Parvathy, “so there’s no room for anything else.” She continues, “my sadhana is one-string. I cannot think of anything else. I am filled with my guru’s ornament. Gold.”

“You cannot run out of this gold,” says Kanai Da. “You give it away and you have more.”

“Everything is impermanent,” says Parvathy, “except that ‘I,’ which we call love, to give it a word. Even words are impermanent. Only the essential ‘I’ exists.

The practice of the heart

“In Baul, it’s the practice of the heart,” says Lalitha. A quintessential mood of love for Bauls is that of longing, the heart both broken and full.

Jim, a Baul practitioner from the United States and Lalitha’s husband, illustrates this with a poem written by Lee, the Western Baul teacher, to his own guru Yogi Ramsuratkumar. It ends,

“The Old Man, ageless, eternal / has cracked his son’s heart
in order to heal it. / Who would guess that despair
mixed with Praise and Worship / would be the sacred balm
of Union and Oneness?”

Jim comments, “Without the polarity of both despair and sweet heartbrokenness—heartbrokenness which is expressed as praise and worship—then neither would exist. It’s not like we can leave despair behind.”

As Kanai Da waits for translation, he begins commenting in Bengali to Parvathy.

“What did he say?” asks Jim.

Parvathy smiles. “He just said exactly what you said.”

“The words are nectar because they come from the guru,” continues Kanai Da in Bengali. “After seeing, thinking, experiencing, realizing, experimenting . . . only then they write.”

A surprise that you’re alive

After singing one afternoon Kanai Da speaks on death. His words, as always, leap from poetry, inspiration, humor, his own experience of life, and all that is learned by repeating thousands of songs until they become a part of his body, as intimate as his own breath.

“Death can come anytime, anywhere,” he says. “Death doesn’t have any rules. Death is present. Death doesn’t listen to anyone.”

“I’m here, I’m talking, and suddenly, I have a heart attack, I’m dead. I’m here at this moment, but death can take me, so what does it mean, staying here? And after, I’m not here.”

“Usually we refuse to think we will die. We always think we will never die. But if we know in our hearts that we will die, know that that day will come, then we live longer, because we don’t waste any moment.”

“Life is a gift. It is a surprise that you’re alive. Every morning you wake up and it’s a surprise—the gift of being alive.”

“If we could spend every moment of our life in our sadhana, moving toward Brahman [pure consciousness, supreme reality], our lives would be even fuller.”

“One who knows this truth and who is living with the divine every day can decide between life and death, even the time of death [for a great yogi]. Then death is not a surprise. For a sadhaka, death is not an accident. For most people it’s an accident.”

When he stops speaking, the reality of death sits with us in the silence.

Lalitha adds, “If you’re aware of your death, every day, even if you don’t know ‘I’ll die in ten minutes,’ you can be prepared.”

Parvathy says her guru Sanatan Das Baul began talking about his death from almost when she met him, over two decades ago. Before he died in 2016, he spent time visiting the samadhis (tombs) of other great yogis, deciding what time of year he wanted to die. For many reasons, including the seasons, astrology, and the deaths of other yogis, he chose February. He died February 28, 2016.

What was Sanatan Das doing to prepare for his death throughout his life?

“He watched his breath 24 hours a day,” says Parvathy.

Only the essential ‘I’ exists

“Everything is impermanent,” says Parvathy, “except that ‘I’, which we call love, to give it a word. Even words are impermanent. Only the essential ‘I’ exists. This observer that even as a child is the same, that has no age. This is love, which we cannot hold, but we can sense.”

“All humans are humans,” says Kanai Da, “American human, Canadian human, Indian human. The essential ‘I’ is the same. This has no culture. The form might be different, but the truth is the same.”

ARTWORK © SEKHAR ROY
PHOTO © PAWEL BIENKOWSKI PHOTOS / ALAMY.COM

[wcm_restrict plans="Sufi Journal Digital Edition, Sufi Journal Digital Edition old"]
RETURN TO ISSUE 96 TABLE OF CONTENTS
[/wcm_restrict]
[wcm_nonmember]
To read this article in full, you must Buy Digital Subscription, or log in if you are a subscriber.
[/wcm_nonmember]